If you’re the author of your own RSS feed, then this is a mandatory step you can’t skip. It’s best you run your RSS feed through a validator service to confirm you’re compliant and everything is in order. A task not quite as simple, because there have been different iterations of RSS and feed readers can still trip over different elements. RSS feed errorsĪs flexible as XML appears to be, users should make a note that to function properly an RSS feed ought to comply with established standards. An issue further exasperated by the lack of a central entity that standardizes these specs. Partially, this is due to the several iterations RSS has gone through, which leave users wondering about specifications. Straightforward and relatively easy to learn by people with limited coding experience.Īnd yet, RSS feeds are just as prone to errors as every other piece of coding. To that end, an RSS feed contains only two elements, which are the header (feed title, description and link where applicable) and the content (the entries in the feed). The purpose of XML is to describe the content of the source data. RSS feeds are coded in XML (eXtended Markup Language) – a language somewhat related to its more popular sibling HTML with the exception that XML lacks styling data. That said, it is a neat solution to the problem, and the library itself looks well written and high quality at first glance.Back to knowledge base The 5 most common RSS feed problems and how to fix them At least with the API changeover, there's a published plan to refer to. Personally, I wouldn't rely on this for anything critical in production. If IG ever change this (even adding or removing a space), this will stop working without warning. For instance, this script relies on the string window._sharedData = appearing in the page exactly. A scraper must make assumptions about the contents of the page it's scraping. The fact that it's scraping the returned HTML makes it much less reliable. If IG's CORS policy ever changes, everything relying on this will stop working without warning. The fact that this is undocumented (AFAICT) gives it unknown reliability. Is this intentional? Accidental? Who knows - it's definitely not common though. I tested with an origin of "Blah Blah" and it worked - it doesn't need to even be a domain. The fact that IG appears to be allowing any origin suggests they're deliberately allowing this behaviour. Ordinarily, a request like this would be blocked - javascript on a website can only request from it's own domain (the same-origin policy), or a host which sets that Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to allow the domain. That's an interesting/odd policy for something like IG. surprising! It's basically a web-scraper in Javascript, and works because IG's web endpoints are setting a CORS Access-Control-Allow-Origin header on the response which matches any Origin header you send. Here's the set-up I have for reference (includes liquid language as used on Shopify, so just ignore - That's. not sure if that has anything to do with it? Are there any known security settings that will prevent instafeed from working on a specific account? To note, the account I'm looking to pull in has a very large following. When I plug in my personal Instagram account userId & clientId, everything works perfect so I know it's not an issue with how I have it set up. I have it all setup - but it will not pull in my client's account. I'm working on a client project (built on Shopify platform) and am looking to pull in their Instagram posts by user. Credentials created before the API restrictions went live are not affected for now. UPDATE ( This thread has turned into a conversation about how Instafeed.js is going to work with Instagram's new API restrictions.Ĭurrently, new Instagram API clients are not able to fetch much of the data that Instafeed.js relied on to work, and we are evaluating options for how to handle authentication going forward.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |